Development agreements require legal possession or effective enjoyment for capital gains transfer; permissive possession and deferred consideration de...
Prolonged sterilisation of development rights supports capital-gains treatment, while business-income disallowances cannot govern capital-gains comput...
Additional evidence in transfer pricing dispute leads to fresh examination, while tax deductions, TDS credit, fee and refund interest require verifica...
Category II AIF pass-through taxation preserves non-business income character; investment receipts cannot be reclassified without applying recognised ...
Levy of penalty u/s 114 of the Customs Act, 1962 on the owners of the seized goods - Allegation that, pulses (URAD ki Dal) in question were meant for illegal export from India to Nepal - Requirement to cross-examination of the witnesses. Genuineness of the Punchnama - panch witnesses are stated to be ‘daily wage laborers'. - The tribunal set aside the penalty in the absence of allowing cross-examination of witness.
Levy of penalty u/s 114 of the Customs Act, 1962 on the owners of the seized goods - Allegation that, pulses (URAD ki Dal) in question were meant for illegal export from India to Nepal - Requirement to cross-examination of the witnesses. Genuineness of the Punchnama - panch witnesses are stated to be ‘daily wage laborers'. - The tribunal set aside the penalty in the absence of allowing cross-examination of witness.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
of 4805
Join Channel
TaxTMI 
