Charitable trust registration requires a specified-violation notice; settled cash deposits and related-party payments did not justify cancellation or ...
External development charges trigger TDS under section 194C, while disputed administrative payments require factual verification and fresh adjudicatio...
Section 270AA penalty immunity requires identified statutory defaults and a hearing before rejection; reassessment disclosure may constitute under-rep...
Section 80JJAA employee-cost deduction allowed for deployed staff but barred against transfer-pricing income enhancement, with pricing issues remanded...
Transfer-pricing methodology protects commercially genuine associated-enterprise payments, while pre-2016 secondary adjustments and related notional i...
Negative liens over operating assets can constitute international transactions requiring arm's-length pricing reflecting restricted borrowing and expa...
Cross-examination rights in Customs Broker revocation inquiries require witness examination; procedural denial may be cured through fresh adjudication...
Interest for delay in payment of Output Tax - return was not declared within the prescribed time - claim of less ITC wrongly however remaining amount was lying in ECRL - The High Court refers to the amendment of Section 50(1) of the CGST Act, which provides that interest would be levied only on the portion of the tax paid by debiting the electronic cash ledger. - The High Court concludes that the notice and impugned order should be set aside and remanded back for reconsideration, taking into consideration the amendment to Section 50(1) and the petitioner's argument regarding the inadvertent mistake.
Interest for delay in payment of Output Tax - return was not declared within the prescribed time - claim of less ITC wrongly however remaining amount was lying in ECRL - The High Court refers to the amendment of Section 50(1) of the CGST Act, which provides that interest would be levied only on the portion of the tax paid by debiting the electronic cash ledger. - The High Court concludes that the notice and impugned order should be set aside and remanded back for reconsideration, taking into consideration the amendment to Section 50(1) and the petitioner's argument regarding the inadvertent mistake.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.