Political contribution deductions require assessee-specific proof before cash-back allegations can justify disallowance or unexplained-money additions...
Refund of wrongly paid Central Excise Duty on Retail Sale Price (Maximum Retail Price-MRP) - unjust enrichment - The authorities concluded that the appellant had passed on the incidence of higher duty to their customers. The appellant failed to provide sufficient evidence to prove the non-passing of the duty burden, such as detailed customer ledgers showing accounting of invoices and subsequent credit/debit notes. - The Tribunal found no merit in the appellant's claim for a refund to be paid to them, instead of being credited to the Consumer Welfare Fund.
Refund of wrongly paid Central Excise Duty on Retail Sale Price (Maximum Retail Price-MRP) - unjust enrichment - The authorities concluded that the appellant had passed on the incidence of higher duty to their customers. The appellant failed to provide sufficient evidence to prove the non-passing of the duty burden, such as detailed customer ledgers showing accounting of invoices and subsequent credit/debit notes. - The Tribunal found no merit in the appellant's claim for a refund to be paid to them, instead of being credited to the Consumer Welfare Fund.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
TaxTMI 
Join Channel 
