Political contribution deductions require genuine transactions; banking records and party registration alone cannot defeat evidence of accommodation e...
Post-death GST liability permits fresh proceedings against legal representatives, while discontinued-business recovery remains limited to the inherite...
Non-confirmation of FEMA seizure prevents adjudicators from overriding pending appellate findings on recorded reasons and suspected foreign asset hold...
Refund of wrongly paid Central Excise Duty on Retail Sale Price (Maximum Retail Price-MRP) - unjust enrichment - The authorities concluded that the appellant had passed on the incidence of higher duty to their customers. The appellant failed to provide sufficient evidence to prove the non-passing of the duty burden, such as detailed customer ledgers showing accounting of invoices and subsequent credit/debit notes. - The Tribunal found no merit in the appellant's claim for a refund to be paid to them, instead of being credited to the Consumer Welfare Fund.
Refund of wrongly paid Central Excise Duty on Retail Sale Price (Maximum Retail Price-MRP) - unjust enrichment - The authorities concluded that the appellant had passed on the incidence of higher duty to their customers. The appellant failed to provide sufficient evidence to prove the non-passing of the duty burden, such as detailed customer ledgers showing accounting of invoices and subsequent credit/debit notes. - The Tribunal found no merit in the appellant's claim for a refund to be paid to them, instead of being credited to the Consumer Welfare Fund.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
TaxTMI 
