Composite show-cause notices spanning multiple financial years are jurisdictionally invalid, allowing writ review despite an alternative appellate rem...
Validity of demand of VAT and penalty - suppression of the sales/stock difference - The penalty was confirmed based on a prior inspection u/s 29 of the HVAT Act and subsequent procedures under Section 38. The court upheld the tribunal's decision that the penalty was correctly levied under both the HVAT Act and the Central Sales Tax Act. - HC
Validity of demand of VAT and penalty - suppression of the sales/stock difference - The penalty was confirmed based on a prior inspection u/s 29 of the HVAT Act and subsequent procedures under Section 38. The court upheld the tribunal's decision that the penalty was correctly levied under both the HVAT Act and the Central Sales Tax Act. - HC
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
TaxTMI 
Join Channel 
