<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>Court Upholds VAT Demand and Penalty for Sales Suppression and Stock Discrepancies Under HVAT and Central Sales Tax Acts.</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=74310</link>
    <description>Validity of demand of VAT and penalty - suppression of the sales/stock difference - The penalty was confirmed based on a prior inspection u/s 29 of the HVAT Act and subsequent procedures under Section 38. The court upheld the tribunal&#039;s decision that the penalty was correctly levied under both the HVAT Act and the Central Sales Tax Act. - HC</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 22 Jan 2024 08:24:13 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 22 Jan 2024 08:24:13 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=740971" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>Court Upholds VAT Demand and Penalty for Sales Suppression and Stock Discrepancies Under HVAT and Central Sales Tax Acts.</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=74310</link>
      <description>Validity of demand of VAT and penalty - suppression of the sales/stock difference - The penalty was confirmed based on a prior inspection u/s 29 of the HVAT Act and subsequent procedures under Section 38. The court upheld the tribunal&#039;s decision that the penalty was correctly levied under both the HVAT Act and the Central Sales Tax Act. - HC</description>
      <category>Highlights</category>
      <law>VAT and Sales Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 22 Jan 2024 08:24:13 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=74310</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>