Alternative statutory remedy and unexplained delay barred writ review of customs confiscation adjudication, leaving merits for appellate consideration...
Authorised courier due diligence protects against penalties where declared exports conceal prohibited goods despite proper documentation and customs p...
Customs-controlled container movement now extends to DP World facilities, subject to segregation, inspections, reconciliation, and EXIM cargo priority...
Levy of penalty on appellant u/s 114 (i) and 114 AA of the Customs Act, 1962 - assisting / abetment of export of Muriate of Potash - illicit export of goods - Based on the fact that the Appellant had prepared the documents without the signature of the exporter, no conclusion can be drawn that Appellant was aware about the presence of prohibited goods. No penalty - AT
Levy of penalty on appellant u/s 114 (i) and 114 AA of the Customs Act, 1962 - assisting / abetment of export of Muriate of Potash - illicit export of goods - Based on the fact that the Appellant had prepared the documents without the signature of the exporter, no conclusion can be drawn that Appellant was aware about the presence of prohibited goods. No penalty - AT
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.