PMLA anticipatory bail requires satisfaction of twin conditions, while predicate-offence protection does not extend to independent money-laundering pr...
School-affiliation charges remain taxable where not directly connected with examinations, while extended limitation requires proof of deliberate tax e...
Refund claim - Benefit of exemption - the product under dispute fell both under for Sl No.20 and Sl No.20A during the period under question. - This is rather a case of ambiguity in the Taxation liability and not a case of ambiguity on account of exemption granted. The Revenue cannot deny that during this period, any importer could have insisted on getting the NIL rate of BCD benefit by citing the co-existence of Sl No.20 and Sl No.20A for the brief period. - Refund cannot be denied - AT
Refund claim - Benefit of exemption - the product under dispute fell both under for Sl No.20 and Sl No.20A during the period under question. - This is rather a case of ambiguity in the Taxation liability and not a case of ambiguity on account of exemption granted. The Revenue cannot deny that during this period, any importer could have insisted on getting the NIL rate of BCD benefit by citing the co-existence of Sl No.20 and Sl No.20A for the brief period. - Refund cannot be denied - AT
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.