Political contribution deductions require genuine transactions; banking records and party registration alone cannot defeat evidence of accommodation e...
Post-death GST liability permits fresh proceedings against legal representatives, while discontinued-business recovery remains limited to the inherite...
Non-confirmation of FEMA seizure prevents adjudicators from overriding pending appellate findings on recorded reasons and suspected foreign asset hold...
Refund claim - Benefit of exemption - the product under dispute fell both under for Sl No.20 and Sl No.20A during the period under question. - This is rather a case of ambiguity in the Taxation liability and not a case of ambiguity on account of exemption granted. The Revenue cannot deny that during this period, any importer could have insisted on getting the NIL rate of BCD benefit by citing the co-existence of Sl No.20 and Sl No.20A for the brief period. - Refund cannot be denied - AT
Refund claim - Benefit of exemption - the product under dispute fell both under for Sl No.20 and Sl No.20A during the period under question. - This is rather a case of ambiguity in the Taxation liability and not a case of ambiguity on account of exemption granted. The Revenue cannot deny that during this period, any importer could have insisted on getting the NIL rate of BCD benefit by citing the co-existence of Sl No.20 and Sl No.20A for the brief period. - Refund cannot be denied - AT
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.