Retrospective cancellation of charitable registration under section 12AB(4) was unsustainable; related-party benefit allegations did not prove nongenu...
Merger control notice and disclosure rules: Supreme Court limits penalties, rejects reopening of approved combination, and sets aside adverse findings...
Page of 4805
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
2701 to 2720 of 96100 Results
❮
❯
❯❯
0 / 200
Expand Note
Add to Folder
No Folders have been created
+
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
Levy of penalty u/s 112(a) of Customs Act, 1962 - contention of appellant is that earlier similar goods were allowed for clearance has not been contested by Revenue - when the goods are allowed to be re-exported, neither redemption fine nor duty was required to be paid. At the same time, penalty is also not to be imposed on the importers. - AT
Levy of penalty u/s 112(a) of Customs Act, 1962 - contention of appellant is that earlier similar goods were allowed for clearance has not been contested by Revenue - when the goods are allowed to be re-exported, neither redemption fine nor duty was required to be paid. At the same time, penalty is also not to be imposed on the importers. - AT
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.