<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>Penalty Dispute u/s 112(a) of Customs Act: Appellant Challenges Penalty on Re-exported Goods Cleared Without Contest Previously.</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=72434</link>
    <description>Levy of penalty u/s 112(a) of Customs Act, 1962 - contention of appellant is that earlier similar goods were allowed for clearance has not been contested by Revenue - when the goods are allowed to be re-exported, neither redemption fine nor duty was required to be paid. At the same time, penalty is also not to be imposed on the importers. - AT</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 09 Oct 2023 08:41:24 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 09 Oct 2023 08:41:24 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=728467" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>Penalty Dispute u/s 112(a) of Customs Act: Appellant Challenges Penalty on Re-exported Goods Cleared Without Contest Previously.</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=72434</link>
      <description>Levy of penalty u/s 112(a) of Customs Act, 1962 - contention of appellant is that earlier similar goods were allowed for clearance has not been contested by Revenue - when the goods are allowed to be re-exported, neither redemption fine nor duty was required to be paid. At the same time, penalty is also not to be imposed on the importers. - AT</description>
      <category>Highlights</category>
      <law>Customs</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 09 Oct 2023 08:41:24 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=72434</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>