Inherited property sale proceeds require capital-gains treatment where ownership is supported by evidence, not suspicion or unverified signature doubt...
Cross-examination of retracted statements is essential where foundational evidence supports a benami allegation and documented funding explanations re...
Capital-goods exemption covers plant-modernisation accessories, while the import restriction applies only to earlier capital-goods components and spar...
Constitutional judicial review permits challenges to ECIRs and connected money-laundering proceedings where coercive action affects fundamental intere...
Validity of Reopening of assessment - deduction claimed u/s 54 - In the ITR, the assessee clearly discloses the said sale consideration coupled with the deductions claimed as described above. Apparently, prior to issuance of notice u/s 148A(b) of the Act, the Assessing Officer failed to notice the said disclosures. - It is a clear case of non-application of mind by the AO - HC
Validity of Reopening of assessment - deduction claimed u/s 54 - In the ITR, the assessee clearly discloses the said sale consideration coupled with the deductions claimed as described above. Apparently, prior to issuance of notice u/s 148A(b) of the Act, the Assessing Officer failed to notice the said disclosures. - It is a clear case of non-application of mind by the AO - HC
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
of 4788
Join Channel
TaxTMI 
