<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>High Court Finds Non-Application of Mind by Assessing Officer in Reopening Assessment u/s 54 Due to Clear Disclosures.</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=71656</link>
    <description>Validity of Reopening of assessment - deduction claimed u/s 54 - In the ITR, the assessee clearly discloses the said sale consideration coupled with the deductions claimed as described above. Apparently, prior to issuance of notice u/s 148A(b) of the Act, the Assessing Officer failed to notice the said disclosures. - It is a clear case of non-application of mind by the AO - HC</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 25 Aug 2023 13:36:50 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 25 Aug 2023 13:36:50 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=723667" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>High Court Finds Non-Application of Mind by Assessing Officer in Reopening Assessment u/s 54 Due to Clear Disclosures.</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=71656</link>
      <description>Validity of Reopening of assessment - deduction claimed u/s 54 - In the ITR, the assessee clearly discloses the said sale consideration coupled with the deductions claimed as described above. Apparently, prior to issuance of notice u/s 148A(b) of the Act, the Assessing Officer failed to notice the said disclosures. - It is a clear case of non-application of mind by the AO - HC</description>
      <category>Highlights</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 25 Aug 2023 13:36:50 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=71656</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>