Political contribution deductions require assessee-specific proof before cash-back allegations can justify disallowance or unexplained-money additions...
Deduction u/s 36(1)(viia) - revenue had not taken any action against the directions of the Tribunal as per the original order, and therefore the directions have crystallized which means that the Assessing Officer has no alternate course except to follow the directions. Accordingly, AO in the remand proceedings ought to have verified the availability of sufficiency of provisions as per the books of accounts of the assessee and allow the claim u/s. 36(1)(viia). - AT
Deduction u/s 36(1)(viia) - revenue had not taken any action against the directions of the Tribunal as per the original order, and therefore the directions have crystallized which means that the Assessing Officer has no alternate course except to follow the directions. Accordingly, AO in the remand proceedings ought to have verified the availability of sufficiency of provisions as per the books of accounts of the assessee and allow the claim u/s. 36(1)(viia). - AT
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.