Political contribution deductions require assessee-specific proof before cash-back allegations can justify disallowance or unexplained-money additions...
Dishonour of Cheque - insufficiency of funds - The Session Judge totally overlooked the fact that Sec 139 N.I Act clearly includes a presumption that there exists a legally enforceable debt or liability. However the presumption is rebuttable by the accused. There is no such requirement of the complainant to discharge his initial burden of proof as held by the Session Judge. - HC
Dishonour of Cheque - insufficiency of funds - The Session Judge totally overlooked the fact that Sec 139 N.I Act clearly includes a presumption that there exists a legally enforceable debt or liability. However the presumption is rebuttable by the accused. There is no such requirement of the complainant to discharge his initial burden of proof as held by the Session Judge. - HC
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
TaxTMI 
Join Channel 
