Inherited property sale proceeds require capital-gains treatment where ownership is supported by evidence, not suspicion or unverified signature doubt...
Cross-examination of retracted statements is essential where foundational evidence supports a benami allegation and documented funding explanations re...
Capital-goods exemption covers plant-modernisation accessories, while the import restriction applies only to earlier capital-goods components and spar...
Constitutional judicial review permits challenges to ECIRs and connected money-laundering proceedings where coercive action affects fundamental intere...
Dishonour of Cheque - existence of debt/liability or not - rebuttal of presumption - the Complainant ought to have been substantiated his contention that in fact he has given on a hire Poclain machine to the accused - It is one thing to say that you cannot take up plea and another thing to say that plea is not proved. In this case defence taken by the accused was permissible and he has proved it also. - HC
Dishonour of Cheque - existence of debt/liability or not - rebuttal of presumption - the Complainant ought to have been substantiated his contention that in fact he has given on a hire Poclain machine to the accused - It is one thing to say that you cannot take up plea and another thing to say that plea is not proved. In this case defence taken by the accused was permissible and he has proved it also. - HC
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
of 4794
Join Channel
TaxTMI 
