<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>Court Rules in Favor of Accused in Cheque Dishonor Case: No Existing Debt or Liability Proven.</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=70955</link>
    <description>Dishonour of Cheque - existence of debt/liability or not - rebuttal of presumption - the Complainant ought to have been substantiated his contention that in fact he has given on a hire Poclain machine to the accused - It is one thing to say that you cannot take up plea and another thing to say that plea is not proved. In this case defence taken by the accused was permissible and he has proved it also. - HC</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 18 Jul 2023 08:11:47 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 18 Jul 2023 08:11:47 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=719788" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>Court Rules in Favor of Accused in Cheque Dishonor Case: No Existing Debt or Liability Proven.</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=70955</link>
      <description>Dishonour of Cheque - existence of debt/liability or not - rebuttal of presumption - the Complainant ought to have been substantiated his contention that in fact he has given on a hire Poclain machine to the accused - It is one thing to say that you cannot take up plea and another thing to say that plea is not proved. In this case defence taken by the accused was permissible and he has proved it also. - HC</description>
      <category>Highlights</category>
      <law>Indian Laws</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 18 Jul 2023 08:11:47 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=70955</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>