Political contribution deductions require assessee-specific proof before cash-back allegations can justify disallowance or unexplained-money additions...
Deduction claimed u/s 54F OR 54 - Investment of LTCG - Owning more than one house property - CIT(A) deleted the addition considering the same u/s 54 - Assessee revised the claim of exemption from u/s 54F to u/s 54 in appeal - Assessee specifically claimed deduction u/s 54 only in the return filed in response to notice u/s 148. Therefore by no stretch of imagination, the claim of the assessee could be treated as fresh claim. - AT
Deduction claimed u/s 54F OR 54 - Investment of LTCG - Owning more than one house property - CIT(A) deleted the addition considering the same u/s 54 - Assessee revised the claim of exemption from u/s 54F to u/s 54 in appeal - Assessee specifically claimed deduction u/s 54 only in the return filed in response to notice u/s 148. Therefore by no stretch of imagination, the claim of the assessee could be treated as fresh claim. - AT
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
TaxTMI 
Join Channel 
