Alternative statutory remedy and unexplained delay barred writ review of customs confiscation adjudication, leaving merits for appellate consideration...
Authorised courier due diligence protects against penalties where declared exports conceal prohibited goods despite proper documentation and customs p...
Customs-controlled container movement now extends to DP World facilities, subject to segregation, inspections, reconciliation, and EXIM cargo priority...
Principles of unjust enrichment - Refund - leading cogent evidence including the evidence produced earlier - for the period prior to the introduction of Section 11B of the Central Excise Act, 1944 and Section 27(1A) of the Customs Act, 1962 - Apex Court dismissed the appeal of the STEEL AUTHORITY OF INDIA LTD. - The assessee has to prove that benefit of duty incidence has not been passed on to the buyer of the goods - SC
Principles of unjust enrichment - Refund - leading cogent evidence including the evidence produced earlier - for the period prior to the introduction of Section 11B of the Central Excise Act, 1944 and Section 27(1A) of the Customs Act, 1962 - Apex Court dismissed the appeal of the STEEL AUTHORITY OF INDIA LTD. - The assessee has to prove that benefit of duty incidence has not been passed on to the buyer of the goods - SC
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
TaxTMI 
of 4828 
Join Channel 
