Political contribution deductions require assessee-specific proof before cash-back allegations can justify disallowance or unexplained-money additions...
Business Support service or not - privity of contract - doctors appointed on contractual basis - collection of consultation fees/charges from the patients it cannot be said that the appellants hospital is the recipient of service provided by the doctors inasmuch as the appellants actually availed the professional services of the doctors, for which they pay certain amount from the payment received from the patients. Hence, as a recipient of service, the liability to pay service tax cannot be fastened on the appellant. - AT
Business Support service or not - privity of contract - doctors appointed on contractual basis - collection of consultation fees/charges from the patients it cannot be said that the appellants hospital is the recipient of service provided by the doctors inasmuch as the appellants actually availed the professional services of the doctors, for which they pay certain amount from the payment received from the patients. Hence, as a recipient of service, the liability to pay service tax cannot be fastened on the appellant. - AT
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.