Authentication of paper assessment orders upheld, while qualifying repairs, consumables and vendor advance write-offs remain deductible business claim...
Transaction value cannot be rejected solely on non-statutory valuation guidelines without corroborative evidence supporting reassessment of final cust...
Cross-examination rights and corroborated evidence limit customs penalties for misdeclaration in genuine import transactions involving documented clea...
Tariff classification of vehicle gear components follows the specific gearing entry, displacing motor-vehicle parts classification and related liabili...
Revision u/s 263 by CIT - The assessee in its support had complied the requirements as raised by both the revenue authorities. Though the assessment order does not patently indicate that the issue in question had been considered by the AO, the record showed that the AO had applied his mind - Thus investigation by the ld. AO cannot be called ‘lack of investigation’. - AT
Revision u/s 263 by CIT - The assessee in its support had complied the requirements as raised by both the revenue authorities. Though the assessment order does not patently indicate that the issue in question had been considered by the AO, the record showed that the AO had applied his mind - Thus investigation by the ld. AO cannot be called ‘lack of investigation’. - AT
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
of 4784
Join Channel
TaxTMI 
