<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>Income Tax Revision u/s 263 Challenged; AO&#039;s Deliberation on Assessment Process Found Adequate by Records.</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=68814</link>
    <description>Revision u/s 263 by CIT - The assessee in its support had complied the requirements as raised by both the revenue authorities. Though the assessment order does not patently indicate that the issue in question had been considered by the AO, the record showed that the AO had applied his mind - Thus investigation by the ld. AO cannot be called ‘lack of investigation’. - AT</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 20 Mar 2023 08:33:34 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 20 Mar 2023 08:33:34 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=708100" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>Income Tax Revision u/s 263 Challenged; AO&#039;s Deliberation on Assessment Process Found Adequate by Records.</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=68814</link>
      <description>Revision u/s 263 by CIT - The assessee in its support had complied the requirements as raised by both the revenue authorities. Though the assessment order does not patently indicate that the issue in question had been considered by the AO, the record showed that the AO had applied his mind - Thus investigation by the ld. AO cannot be called ‘lack of investigation’. - AT</description>
      <category>Highlights</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 20 Mar 2023 08:33:34 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=68814</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>