Admissibility of electronic evidence bars undervaluation demands where printouts, retracted statements and no cross-examination leave the case unprove...
Page of 4809
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
3221 to 3240 of 96177 Results
❮
❯
❯❯
0 / 200
Expand Note
Add to Folder
No Folders have been created
+
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
Revision u/s 263 by CIT - The assessee in its support had complied the requirements as raised by both the revenue authorities. Though the assessment order does not patently indicate that the issue in question had been considered by the AO, the record showed that the AO had applied his mind - Thus investigation by the ld. AO cannot be called ‘lack of investigation’. - AT
Revision u/s 263 by CIT - The assessee in its support had complied the requirements as raised by both the revenue authorities. Though the assessment order does not patently indicate that the issue in question had been considered by the AO, the record showed that the AO had applied his mind - Thus investigation by the ld. AO cannot be called ‘lack of investigation’. - AT
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
TaxTMI 
of 4809 
Join Channel 
