Rectification of mistake remains limited to self-evident record errors, preventing merits review through miscellaneous applications and preserving fin...
Tender creditworthiness conditions may extend to de facto Promoter Directors, with post-participation challenges generally barred absent arbitrariness...
Corporate representation in PMLA summons proceedings permitted through an authorised signatory, subject to directors' continuing cooperation and atten...
Helicopter charter classification requires effective control analysis, while territorial performance, reasoned credit orders and wilful suppression de...
The circular issued by the Central Board of Excise and Customs on January 1, 2013, instructs department officers to initiate recovery proceedings on confirmed demands unless a stay order is in place. The article outlines the appeal process and time limits under the Central Excise Act, 1944, and the Finance Act, 1994, for both central excise and service tax. It emphasizes the importance of filing appeals and stay petitions promptly to prevent recovery actions. The article also highlights legal recourse, such as filing writ petitions in High Courts, to seek interim relief against coercive recovery measures by the department.
The circular issued by the Central Board of Excise and Customs on January 1, 2013, instructs department officers to initiate recovery proceedings on confirmed demands unless a stay order is in place. The article outlines the appeal process and time limits under the Central Excise Act, 1944, and the Finance Act, 1994, for both central excise and service tax. It emphasizes the importance of filing appeals and stay petitions promptly to prevent recovery actions. The article also highlights legal recourse, such as filing writ petitions in High Courts, to seek interim relief against coercive recovery measures by the department.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
of 4807
Join Channel
TaxTMI 
