Patent-settlement expenditure treated as commercially expedient revenue outlay, with foreign-law restrictions inapplicable before the prospective amen...
International transaction benchmarking restricts transfer pricing adjustments to associated-enterprise dealings, while functional comparability govern...
Joint development agreements defer taxable transfer where possession lacks part performance, while completed flats determine consideration and exempti...
Passenger baggage re-export requires true declaration and cannot be granted indirectly through discretionary redemption of undeclared prohibited goods...
The circular issued by the Central Board of Excise and Customs on January 1, 2013, instructs department officers to initiate recovery proceedings on confirmed demands unless a stay order is in place. The article outlines the appeal process and time limits under the Central Excise Act, 1944, and the Finance Act, 1994, for both central excise and service tax. It emphasizes the importance of filing appeals and stay petitions promptly to prevent recovery actions. The article also highlights legal recourse, such as filing writ petitions in High Courts, to seek interim relief against coercive recovery measures by the department.
The circular issued by the Central Board of Excise and Customs on January 1, 2013, instructs department officers to initiate recovery proceedings on confirmed demands unless a stay order is in place. The article outlines the appeal process and time limits under the Central Excise Act, 1944, and the Finance Act, 1994, for both central excise and service tax. It emphasizes the importance of filing appeals and stay petitions promptly to prevent recovery actions. The article also highlights legal recourse, such as filing writ petitions in High Courts, to seek interim relief against coercive recovery measures by the department.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
of 4805
Join Channel
TaxTMI 
