Admissibility of electronic evidence bars undervaluation demands where printouts, retracted statements and no cross-examination leave the case unprove...
Page of 4809
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
3221 to 3240 of 96177 Results
❮
❯
❯❯
0 / 200
Expand Note
Add to Folder
No Folders have been created
+
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
Maintainability of appeal - non-compliance with the requirement of pre-deposit under service tax - Applicability of section 35F of the Central Excise Act - The appellant has not made the pre-deposit. In view of the aforesaid decisions of the Delhi High Court and the Madhya Pradesh High Court, it is not possible to permit the appellant to maintain the appeal without making the required pre-deposit. - AT
Maintainability of appeal - non-compliance with the requirement of pre-deposit under service tax - Applicability of section 35F of the Central Excise Act - The appellant has not made the pre-deposit. In view of the aforesaid decisions of the Delhi High Court and the Madhya Pradesh High Court, it is not possible to permit the appellant to maintain the appeal without making the required pre-deposit. - AT
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
TaxTMI 
of 4809 
Join Channel 
