Just a moment...
Convert scanned orders, printed notices, PDFs and images into clean, searchable, editable text within seconds. Starting at 2 Credits/page
Try Now →Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether the appeal under the service tax regime was maintainable without complying with the mandatory pre-deposit requirement.
Analysis: Section 83 of the Finance Act, 1994 makes section 35F of the Central Excise Act applicable to service tax matters. After the 06.08.2014 amendment, section 35F requires deposit of the prescribed percentage before an appeal can be entertained and does not confer any power on the Tribunal or the Commissioner (Appeals) to waive or reduce that requirement. The Tribunal relied on the settled position that a statutory right of appeal can be subjected to mandatory conditions, and that non-compliance with a condition precedent prevents entertainment of the appeal. The cited authorities consistently hold that the appellate forum cannot bypass the statutory mandate of pre-deposit.
Conclusion: The appeal was not maintainable without the required pre-deposit and was liable to be dismissed.