Composite GST notices, mandatory limitation, and same-subject bar: HC upheld valid notices but quashed overlapping proceedings and unauthorised withho...
Unexplained investment u/s 69 - CIT-A deleted addition admitting the additional evidences - ld CIT(A) did not deal with the exceptions of Rule 46A, therefore, ld CIT(A) accepted the additional evidences in violation of Rule 46A of the Rules, which is not tenable in law. - AT
Unexplained investment u/s 69 - CIT-A deleted addition admitting the additional evidences - ld CIT(A) did not deal with the exceptions of Rule 46A, therefore, ld CIT(A) accepted the additional evidences in violation of Rule 46A of the Rules, which is not tenable in law. - AT
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.