<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>CIT-A&#039;s Deletion of Addition Deemed Invalid Due to Rule 46A Violation in Unexplained Investment Case u/s 69.</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=68620</link>
    <description>Unexplained investment u/s 69 - CIT-A deleted addition admitting the additional evidences - ld CIT(A) did not deal with the exceptions of Rule 46A, therefore, ld CIT(A) accepted the additional evidences in violation of Rule 46A of the Rules, which is not tenable in law. - AT</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 06 Mar 2023 11:45:12 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 06 Mar 2023 11:45:12 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=706956" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>CIT-A&#039;s Deletion of Addition Deemed Invalid Due to Rule 46A Violation in Unexplained Investment Case u/s 69.</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=68620</link>
      <description>Unexplained investment u/s 69 - CIT-A deleted addition admitting the additional evidences - ld CIT(A) did not deal with the exceptions of Rule 46A, therefore, ld CIT(A) accepted the additional evidences in violation of Rule 46A of the Rules, which is not tenable in law. - AT</description>
      <category>Highlights</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 06 Mar 2023 11:45:12 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=68620</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>