Inherited property sale proceeds require capital-gains treatment where ownership is supported by evidence, not suspicion or unverified signature doubt...
Cross-examination of retracted statements is essential where foundational evidence supports a benami allegation and documented funding explanations re...
Capital-goods exemption covers plant-modernisation accessories, while the import restriction applies only to earlier capital-goods components and spar...
Constitutional judicial review permits challenges to ECIRs and connected money-laundering proceedings where coercive action affects fundamental intere...
Levy of penalty - the subject container was very much in the custody of the SIIB Officers since no Bill-of-Entry was ever filed and hence, the alleged removal from the CFS could only attract act of ‘theft’ under the Indian Penal Code, for which a separate police complaint was lodged - Fastening the penalty under Section 112(b) ibid against this appellant is only a fallacy, which cannot be sustained - AT
Levy of penalty - the subject container was very much in the custody of the SIIB Officers since no Bill-of-Entry was ever filed and hence, the alleged removal from the CFS could only attract act of ‘theft’ under the Indian Penal Code, for which a separate police complaint was lodged - Fastening the penalty under Section 112(b) ibid against this appellant is only a fallacy, which cannot be sustained - AT
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
of 4790
Join Channel
TaxTMI 
