<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>Penalty Imposed u/s 112(b) Overturned; Container Removal Deemed Theft Under IPC; Police Complaint Filed.</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=66224</link>
    <description>Levy of penalty - the subject container was very much in the custody of the SIIB Officers since no Bill-of-Entry was ever filed and hence, the alleged removal from the CFS could only attract act of ‘theft’ under the Indian Penal Code, for which a separate police complaint was lodged - Fastening the penalty under Section 112(b) ibid against this appellant is only a fallacy, which cannot be sustained - AT</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 28 Oct 2022 15:11:58 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 28 Oct 2022 15:11:58 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=694209" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>Penalty Imposed u/s 112(b) Overturned; Container Removal Deemed Theft Under IPC; Police Complaint Filed.</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=66224</link>
      <description>Levy of penalty - the subject container was very much in the custody of the SIIB Officers since no Bill-of-Entry was ever filed and hence, the alleged removal from the CFS could only attract act of ‘theft’ under the Indian Penal Code, for which a separate police complaint was lodged - Fastening the penalty under Section 112(b) ibid against this appellant is only a fallacy, which cannot be sustained - AT</description>
      <category>Highlights</category>
      <law>Customs</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 28 Oct 2022 15:11:58 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=66224</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>