Faceless reassessment jurisdiction turned on retrospective AO definition, with later faceless-assessment changes treated as clarificatory and procedur...
Page of 4805
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
2121 to 2140 of 96100 Results
❮
❯
❯❯
0 / 200
Expand Note
Add to Folder
No Folders have been created
+
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
Levy of penalty - the subject container was very much in the custody of the SIIB Officers since no Bill-of-Entry was ever filed and hence, the alleged removal from the CFS could only attract act of ‘theft’ under the Indian Penal Code, for which a separate police complaint was lodged - Fastening the penalty under Section 112(b) ibid against this appellant is only a fallacy, which cannot be sustained - AT
Levy of penalty - the subject container was very much in the custody of the SIIB Officers since no Bill-of-Entry was ever filed and hence, the alleged removal from the CFS could only attract act of ‘theft’ under the Indian Penal Code, for which a separate police complaint was lodged - Fastening the penalty under Section 112(b) ibid against this appellant is only a fallacy, which cannot be sustained - AT
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
of 4805
Join Channel
TaxTMI 
