Patent-settlement expenditure treated as commercially expedient revenue outlay, with foreign-law restrictions inapplicable before the prospective amen...
Benami Property Transactions - This Court took the view that Section 2(9)(A) and 2(9)(C) of the Act inserted by the Amendment Act of 2016 are prospective in nature because these two provisions have significantly and substantially widened the definition of ‘benami transaction’ than as was there in the unamended Benami Property Act of 1988. - HC
Benami Property Transactions - This Court took the view that Section 2(9)(A) and 2(9)(C) of the Act inserted by the Amendment Act of 2016 are prospective in nature because these two provisions have significantly and substantially widened the definition of ‘benami transaction’ than as was there in the unamended Benami Property Act of 1988. - HC
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
Join Channel
TaxTMI 
