<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>Court Rules Sections 2(9)(A) &amp; 2(9)(C) of Benami Transactions Amendment Act 2016 Are Prospective, Shaping Property Law Enforcement.</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=65878</link>
    <description>Benami Property Transactions - This Court took the view that Section 2(9)(A) and 2(9)(C) of the Act inserted by the Amendment Act of 2016 are prospective in nature because these two provisions have significantly and substantially widened the definition of ‘benami transaction’ than as was there in the unamended Benami Property Act of 1988. - HC</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 30 Sep 2022 09:37:07 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 30 Sep 2022 09:37:07 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=692227" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>Court Rules Sections 2(9)(A) &amp; 2(9)(C) of Benami Transactions Amendment Act 2016 Are Prospective, Shaping Property Law Enforcement.</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=65878</link>
      <description>Benami Property Transactions - This Court took the view that Section 2(9)(A) and 2(9)(C) of the Act inserted by the Amendment Act of 2016 are prospective in nature because these two provisions have significantly and substantially widened the definition of ‘benami transaction’ than as was there in the unamended Benami Property Act of 1988. - HC</description>
      <category>Highlights</category>
      <law>Direct Taxes</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 30 Sep 2022 09:37:07 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=65878</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>