Dispute Resolution Panel objections must reach both prescribed forums; otherwise assessment may proceed and statutory appeal remains the proper remedy...
Political contribution deductions require recipient party compliance with contribution-reporting conditions; banking-channel donations alone do not qu...
Aggregation under TNMM prevents selective testing of intra-group services without comparable uncontrolled transactions, while appellate additional cla...
Protective assessment cannot duplicate identical receipts under competing characterisations; remote services did not establish a taxable permanent est...
Addition u/s 68 - We do not understand proposition of the assessee that cash had changed the hands from the company to its promoter–Director without any reason and there is no reason forthcoming as to why the cash was paid in cash by the three parties. There is no document produced before either the AO or before CIT (Appeals) or before us to prove the genuineness of the transaction. - While deleting the addition the CIT (Appeals) has not discussed about the proving of genuineness of the transaction by the assessee. - Matter restored back - AT
Addition u/s 68 - We do not understand proposition of the assessee that cash had changed the hands from the company to its promoter–Director without any reason and there is no reason forthcoming as to why the cash was paid in cash by the three parties. There is no document produced before either the AO or before CIT (Appeals) or before us to prove the genuineness of the transaction. - While deleting the addition the CIT (Appeals) has not discussed about the proving of genuineness of the transaction by the assessee. - Matter restored back - AT
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
of 4805
Join Channel
TaxTMI 
