Retrospective cancellation of charitable registration under section 12AB(4) was unsustainable; related-party benefit allegations did not prove nongenu...
Merger control notice and disclosure rules: Supreme Court limits penalties, rejects reopening of approved combination, and sets aside adverse findings...
Addition u/s 68 - We do not understand proposition of the assessee that cash had changed the hands from the company to its promoter–Director without any reason and there is no reason forthcoming as to why the cash was paid in cash by the three parties. There is no document produced before either the AO or before CIT (Appeals) or before us to prove the genuineness of the transaction. - While deleting the addition the CIT (Appeals) has not discussed about the proving of genuineness of the transaction by the assessee. - Matter restored back - AT
Addition u/s 68 - We do not understand proposition of the assessee that cash had changed the hands from the company to its promoter–Director without any reason and there is no reason forthcoming as to why the cash was paid in cash by the three parties. There is no document produced before either the AO or before CIT (Appeals) or before us to prove the genuineness of the transaction. - While deleting the addition the CIT (Appeals) has not discussed about the proving of genuineness of the transaction by the assessee. - Matter restored back - AT
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
TaxTMI 
of 4817 
Join Channel 
