Arrest safeguards and transit remand requirements invalidated detention following inter-State transfer without communicated grounds or magistrate auth...
Arrest safeguards require disclosed grounds, relative intimation and transit remand, while duplicate prosecution under the CGST framework is unsustain...
Document Identification Number defects can invalidate GST assessments, with delayed challenges entertained conditionally where patent irregularities e...
Windmill commissioning evidence supported higher depreciation where grid connection and electricity generation proved operational use before the relev...
Pharmaceutical promotion and transfer-pricing comparability principles limited disallowances, while uncorroborated search allegations and unsupported ...
Business expenditure substantiation supports scrap credits, statutory payments and expense claims, while depreciation requires proof of actual busines...
Cancellation of petitioner’s GST registration - non-compliance with the directions of first appellate authority for restoring the registration - It cannot but be accepted that under Rule 25 of the Central Goods and Services Tax Rules, 2017, before carrying out physical inspection, the respondents/revenue are required to serve a notice on the concerned person/entity. However, as noticed above, all this did not form part of the order dated 10.10.2021 - Furthermore, the first appellate authority has given a rationale for revoking the order cancelling the petitioner’s GST registration - there are no good reason not to direct the respondents/revenue to comply with the OIA. - Directions issued to restore the registration as per the order - HC
Cancellation of petitioner’s GST registration - non-compliance with the directions of first appellate authority for restoring the registration - It cannot but be accepted that under Rule 25 of the Central Goods and Services Tax Rules, 2017, before carrying out physical inspection, the respondents/revenue are required to serve a notice on the concerned person/entity. However, as noticed above, all this did not form part of the order dated 10.10.2021 - Furthermore, the first appellate authority has given a rationale for revoking the order cancelling the petitioner’s GST registration - there are no good reason not to direct the respondents/revenue to comply with the OIA. - Directions issued to restore the registration as per the order - HC
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
of 4786
Join Channel
TaxTMI 
