<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>GST Registration Restored: Failure to Serve Notice for Inspection Violated Rule 25 of CGST Rules, 2017.</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=65142</link>
    <description>Cancellation of petitioner’s GST registration - non-compliance with the directions of first appellate authority for restoring the registration - It cannot but be accepted that under Rule 25 of the Central Goods and Services Tax Rules, 2017, before carrying out physical inspection, the respondents/revenue are required to serve a notice on the concerned person/entity. However, as noticed above, all this did not form part of the order dated 10.10.2021 - Furthermore, the first appellate authority has given a rationale for revoking the order cancelling the petitioner’s GST registration - there are no good reason not to direct the respondents/revenue to comply with the OIA. - Directions issued to restore the registration as per the order - HC</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 17 Aug 2022 16:32:12 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 17 Aug 2022 16:32:12 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=688104" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>GST Registration Restored: Failure to Serve Notice for Inspection Violated Rule 25 of CGST Rules, 2017.</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=65142</link>
      <description>Cancellation of petitioner’s GST registration - non-compliance with the directions of first appellate authority for restoring the registration - It cannot but be accepted that under Rule 25 of the Central Goods and Services Tax Rules, 2017, before carrying out physical inspection, the respondents/revenue are required to serve a notice on the concerned person/entity. However, as noticed above, all this did not form part of the order dated 10.10.2021 - Furthermore, the first appellate authority has given a rationale for revoking the order cancelling the petitioner’s GST registration - there are no good reason not to direct the respondents/revenue to comply with the OIA. - Directions issued to restore the registration as per the order - HC</description>
      <category>Highlights</category>
      <law>GST</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 17 Aug 2022 16:32:12 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=65142</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>