Political contribution deductions require assessee-specific proof before cash-back allegations can justify disallowance or unexplained-money additions...
Insolvency and BankruptcyAugust 5, 2022Case LawsAT
Appointment of IRP - the provisions of law empower the CoC contemplated under Section 22 of the I&B Code, 2016 either to continue the IRP as RP or replace the IRP. When the provisions are unambiguous and authorises the CoC to act in accordance with law the same cannot be interfered with by the Tribunals unless and until it is arbitrary, illegal and irrational and dehors the provisions of the Code and the Rules. - this Tribunal comes to an irresistible and inescapable conclusion that the Appellant has made a prima-facie case to be interfered with the order passed by the Adjudicating Authority. - AT
Appointment of IRP - the provisions of law empower the CoC contemplated under Section 22 of the I&B Code, 2016 either to continue the IRP as RP or replace the IRP. When the provisions are unambiguous and authorises the CoC to act in accordance with law the same cannot be interfered with by the Tribunals unless and until it is arbitrary, illegal and irrational and dehors the provisions of the Code and the Rules. - this Tribunal comes to an irresistible and inescapable conclusion that the Appellant has made a prima-facie case to be interfered with the order passed by the Adjudicating Authority. - AT
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
TaxTMI 
Join Channel 
