Charitable trust registration requires a specified-violation notice; settled cash deposits and related-party payments did not justify cancellation or ...
External development charges trigger TDS under section 194C, while disputed administrative payments require factual verification and fresh adjudicatio...
Section 270AA penalty immunity requires identified statutory defaults and a hearing before rejection; reassessment disclosure may constitute under-rep...
Section 80JJAA employee-cost deduction allowed for deployed staff but barred against transfer-pricing income enhancement, with pricing issues remanded...
Transfer-pricing methodology protects commercially genuine associated-enterprise payments, while pre-2016 secondary adjustments and related notional i...
Negative liens over operating assets can constitute international transactions requiring arm's-length pricing reflecting restricted borrowing and expa...
Cross-examination rights in Customs Broker revocation inquiries require witness examination; procedural denial may be cured through fresh adjudication...
Bogus LTCG - Addition u/s 68 - bogus penny stock transaction - suspicion v/s facts - disallowing the exemption u/s 10(38) - The assessee has demonstrated with substantial evidences before the AO that the actual purchase and sale of the shares took place, such shares had distinctive numbers, the transactions were routed through the normal banking channels and the shares had been allotted to the assessee subsequently under an order of amalgamation/merger by the judgment of Hon’ble High Court of Kolkata and, therefore, mere reliance on the report of Investigation Wing and statement of a Person which do not even mention the name of the assessee, in our considered opinion cannot be upheld. - AT
Bogus LTCG - Addition u/s 68 - bogus penny stock transaction - suspicion v/s facts - disallowing the exemption u/s 10(38) - The assessee has demonstrated with substantial evidences before the AO that the actual purchase and sale of the shares took place, such shares had distinctive numbers, the transactions were routed through the normal banking channels and the shares had been allotted to the assessee subsequently under an order of amalgamation/merger by the judgment of Hon’ble High Court of Kolkata and, therefore, mere reliance on the report of Investigation Wing and statement of a Person which do not even mention the name of the assessee, in our considered opinion cannot be upheld. - AT
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
TaxTMI 
of 4828 
Join Channel 
