Charitable trust registration requires a specified-violation notice; settled cash deposits and related-party payments did not justify cancellation or ...
External development charges trigger TDS under section 194C, while disputed administrative payments require factual verification and fresh adjudicatio...
Section 270AA penalty immunity requires identified statutory defaults and a hearing before rejection; reassessment disclosure may constitute under-rep...
Section 80JJAA employee-cost deduction allowed for deployed staff but barred against transfer-pricing income enhancement, with pricing issues remanded...
Transfer-pricing methodology protects commercially genuine associated-enterprise payments, while pre-2016 secondary adjustments and related notional i...
Negative liens over operating assets can constitute international transactions requiring arm's-length pricing reflecting restricted borrowing and expa...
Cross-examination rights in Customs Broker revocation inquiries require witness examination; procedural denial may be cured through fresh adjudication...
Disqualification of the Successful Resolution Applicant u/s 29A of the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code, 2016 - It is found that the Resolution Applicant was eligible on 30.11.2019 when it submitted the first Resolution Plan, there are no necessity to enter into other submission raised by learned Counsel for the parties including the submission regarding applicability of the proviso to Section 29A(c). The Resolution Applicant being eligible, was entitled to submit Resolution Plan and was also entitled to revise its Plan from time to time as per the Scheme of the Code. The Plan having approved by 100% vote of CoC, there are no error in the decision of the Adjudicating Authority rejecting the application filed by the Appellant. - AT
Disqualification of the Successful Resolution Applicant u/s 29A of the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code, 2016 - It is found that the Resolution Applicant was eligible on 30.11.2019 when it submitted the first Resolution Plan, there are no necessity to enter into other submission raised by learned Counsel for the parties including the submission regarding applicability of the proviso to Section 29A(c). The Resolution Applicant being eligible, was entitled to submit Resolution Plan and was also entitled to revise its Plan from time to time as per the Scheme of the Code. The Plan having approved by 100% vote of CoC, there are no error in the decision of the Adjudicating Authority rejecting the application filed by the Appellant. - AT
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
TaxTMI 
of 4828 
Join Channel 
