Political contribution deductions require assessee-specific proof before cash-back allegations can justify disallowance or unexplained-money additions...
Revision u/s 263 - Assessee merely kept referring to the decision that an enquiry was made by the ld. AO and section 263 should not have been invoked. We, however, find no merit in the contention of the ld. Counsel for the assesse with regard to the issue of claim of depreciation on electrical installation because though the inquiry was initiated, but the same was incomplete as the assessee did not reply to it in the way it ought to be. - Therefore, in real terms, there was no enquiry on the said issue. - Revision order sustained - AT
Revision u/s 263 - Assessee merely kept referring to the decision that an enquiry was made by the ld. AO and section 263 should not have been invoked. We, however, find no merit in the contention of the ld. Counsel for the assesse with regard to the issue of claim of depreciation on electrical installation because though the inquiry was initiated, but the same was incomplete as the assessee did not reply to it in the way it ought to be. - Therefore, in real terms, there was no enquiry on the said issue. - Revision order sustained - AT
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
TaxTMI 
Join Channel 
