Political contribution deductions require assessee-specific proof before cash-back allegations can justify disallowance or unexplained-money additions...
Revision u/s 263 - case was selected for limited scrutiny - Whether the AO has considered the issue is question - the statement of Reconciliation of 26AS filed by the Appellant is also not sufficient to show that the contract fee has been offered to tax correctly. Clearly, the Assessing Officer has not undertaken necessary inquires/verification during assessment proceedings. The Assessment Order is also silent on these issues and therefore, does not support the contentions of the Appellant. - AT
Revision u/s 263 - case was selected for limited scrutiny - Whether the AO has considered the issue is question - the statement of Reconciliation of 26AS filed by the Appellant is also not sufficient to show that the contract fee has been offered to tax correctly. Clearly, the Assessing Officer has not undertaken necessary inquires/verification during assessment proceedings. The Assessment Order is also silent on these issues and therefore, does not support the contentions of the Appellant. - AT
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
TaxTMI 
Join Channel 
