Service of notice and contractual debt acknowledgment preserved insolvency admission against a corporate guarantor despite limitation and natural just...
Original works exemption excludes standalone boulder transportation, leaving subcontracted railway-project transport services subject to service tax l...
Annual production capacity determinations excluding stenter galleries support refunds for unconstitutional excise levies without an unjust-enrichment ...
Vicarious liability for cheque dishonour requires specific allegations of responsibility and cheque signatory; generic director allegations cannot sus...
IT Resilience Index requires market infrastructure institutions to automate resilience scoring, early warnings, and continuous service-delivery monito...
CENVAT Credit - inputs and/or capital goods - towers - doors - racks - fall arrestor system - insulation material etc. - telecommunication services is provided by the appellant - credit was denied on the ground that, Towers and parts thereof are fixed to the earth on installation and become immovable and, therefore, cannot be considered to be goods - the appellant was justified in availing CENVAT credit of central excise duty, as ‘inputs’, on items indicated in Part-I of the chart contained in the paragraph 43 of this decision and as ‘capital goods’ on the items contained in Part-II of the said chart. The appellant would, therefore, be entitled to refund of the said CENVAT credit which was reversed by it ‘under protest’. - AT
CENVAT Credit - inputs and/or capital goods - towers - doors - racks - fall arrestor system - insulation material etc. - telecommunication services is provided by the appellant - credit was denied on the ground that, Towers and parts thereof are fixed to the earth on installation and become immovable and, therefore, cannot be considered to be goods - the appellant was justified in availing CENVAT credit of central excise duty, as ‘inputs’, on items indicated in Part-I of the chart contained in the paragraph 43 of this decision and as ‘capital goods’ on the items contained in Part-II of the said chart. The appellant would, therefore, be entitled to refund of the said CENVAT credit which was reversed by it ‘under protest’. - AT
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
TaxTMI 
of 4828 
Join Channel 
