<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>Telecom provider wins CENVAT credit appeal; towers, doors, racks qualify as &#039;inputs&#039; and &#039;capital goods&#039; for refund.</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=63182</link>
    <description>CENVAT Credit - inputs and/or capital goods - towers - doors - racks - fall arrestor system - insulation material etc. - telecommunication services is provided by the appellant - credit was denied on the ground that, Towers and parts thereof are fixed to the earth on installation and become immovable and, therefore, cannot be considered to be goods - the appellant was justified in availing CENVAT credit of central excise duty, as ‘inputs’, on items indicated in Part-I of the chart contained in the paragraph 43 of this decision and as ‘capital goods’ on the items contained in Part-II of the said chart. The appellant would, therefore, be entitled to refund of the said CENVAT credit which was reversed by it ‘under protest’. - AT</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Sat, 30 Apr 2022 08:09:28 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 30 Apr 2022 08:09:28 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=677602" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>Telecom provider wins CENVAT credit appeal; towers, doors, racks qualify as &#039;inputs&#039; and &#039;capital goods&#039; for refund.</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=63182</link>
      <description>CENVAT Credit - inputs and/or capital goods - towers - doors - racks - fall arrestor system - insulation material etc. - telecommunication services is provided by the appellant - credit was denied on the ground that, Towers and parts thereof are fixed to the earth on installation and become immovable and, therefore, cannot be considered to be goods - the appellant was justified in availing CENVAT credit of central excise duty, as ‘inputs’, on items indicated in Part-I of the chart contained in the paragraph 43 of this decision and as ‘capital goods’ on the items contained in Part-II of the said chart. The appellant would, therefore, be entitled to refund of the said CENVAT credit which was reversed by it ‘under protest’. - AT</description>
      <category>Highlights</category>
      <law>Service Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Sat, 30 Apr 2022 08:09:28 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=63182</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>