Political contribution deductions require assessee-specific proof before cash-back allegations can justify disallowance or unexplained-money additions...
Validity of statement - retraction of statement - the statement recorded u/s. 132(4) cannot be discarded merely because the retractment statements were filed. The statements u/s. 132(4) are true and correct and brings out the correct picture as at that time the maker of the statement is uninfluenced by external agencies and it is the statements are recorded in the presence of the independent witnesses. Therefore, in our considered opinion, the so-called retraction statements are simple a self-serving statements without any material and cannot override the statements recorded u/s. 132(4) of the Income Tax Act. - AT
Validity of statement - retraction of statement - the statement recorded u/s. 132(4) cannot be discarded merely because the retractment statements were filed. The statements u/s. 132(4) are true and correct and brings out the correct picture as at that time the maker of the statement is uninfluenced by external agencies and it is the statements are recorded in the presence of the independent witnesses. Therefore, in our considered opinion, the so-called retraction statements are simple a self-serving statements without any material and cannot override the statements recorded u/s. 132(4) of the Income Tax Act. - AT
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
TaxTMI 
Join Channel 
