Concessional penalty for search-disclosed unreconciled jewellery applies where substantive disclosure conditions are met despite omission from origina...
Dishonor of Cheque - Just because there is a change in the person who hold the post of Manager, it cannot be stated that the present Manager is not the authorised person to represent the authorised Firm - Neither the appellant-Firm nor PW1 has disputed about the power given to him to represent the Firm. In this background of facts, it cannot be claimed that the respondent/accused had discharged his reverse burden and refuted the initial presumption that has been drawn in favour of the appellant. - HC
Dishonor of Cheque - Just because there is a change in the person who hold the post of Manager, it cannot be stated that the present Manager is not the authorised person to represent the authorised Firm - Neither the appellant-Firm nor PW1 has disputed about the power given to him to represent the Firm. In this background of facts, it cannot be claimed that the respondent/accused had discharged his reverse burden and refuted the initial presumption that has been drawn in favour of the appellant. - HC
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
TaxTMI 
of 4828 
Join Channel 
