https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=63016 Dishonor of Cheque - Just because there is a change in the person who hold the post of Manager, it cannot be stated that the present Manager is not the authorised person to represent the authorised Firm - Neither the appellant-Firm nor PW1 has disputed about the power given to him to represent the Firm. In this background of facts, it cannot be claimed that the respondent/accused had discharged his reverse burden and refuted the initial presumption that has been drawn in favour of the appellant. - HC en-us Thu, 21 Apr 2022 08:30:53 +0530 Thu, 21 Apr 2022 08:30:53 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=63016 Dishonor of Cheque - Just because there is a change in the person who hold the post of Manager, it cannot be stated that the present Manager is not the authorised person to represent the authorised Firm - Neither the appellant-Firm nor PW1 has disputed about the power given to him to represent the Firm. In this background of facts, it cannot be claimed that the respondent/accused had discharged his reverse burden and refuted the initial presumption that has been drawn in favour of the appellant. - HC Highlights Indian Laws Thu, 21 Apr 2022 08:30:53 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=63016