Political contribution deductions require genuine transactions; banking records and party registration alone cannot defeat evidence of accommodation e...
Post-death GST liability permits fresh proceedings against legal representatives, while discontinued-business recovery remains limited to the inherite...
Non-confirmation of FEMA seizure prevents adjudicators from overriding pending appellate findings on recorded reasons and suspected foreign asset hold...
Addition u/s.40(a)(ia) - assessee had paid interest to M/s. Tata Motors Finance Ltd. without deducting tax at source - when the assessee could not be held as an assessee-in-default u/s. 201(1) of the Act, therefore, we concur with the claim of the Ld. AR that as per the "2nd proviso" to Section 40(a)(ia) of the Act, the aforementioned amount could not have been disallowed in the hands of the assessee company. - AT
Addition u/s.40(a)(ia) - assessee had paid interest to M/s. Tata Motors Finance Ltd. without deducting tax at source - when the assessee could not be held as an assessee-in-default u/s. 201(1) of the Act, therefore, we concur with the claim of the Ld. AR that as per the "2nd proviso" to Section 40(a)(ia) of the Act, the aforementioned amount could not have been disallowed in the hands of the assessee company. - AT
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.