Just a moment...

Top
Help
×

By creating an account you can:

Logo TaxTMI
Call Us / Help / Feedback

Contact Us At :

E-mail: [email protected]

Call / WhatsApp at: +91 99117 96707

For more information, Check Contact Us

FAQs :

To know Frequently Asked Questions, Check FAQs

Most Asked Video Tutorials :

For more tutorials, Check Video Tutorials

Submit Feedback/Suggestion :

Email :
Please provide your email address so we can follow up on your feedback.
Category :
Description :
Min 15 characters 0/2000
Make Most of Text Search
  1. Checkout this video tutorial: How to search effectively on TaxTMI.
  2. Put words in double quotes for exact word search, eg: "income tax"
  3. Avoid noise words such as : 'and, of, the, a'
  4. Sort by Relevance to get the most relevant document.
  5. Press Enter to add multiple terms/multiple phrases, and then click on Search to Search.
  6. Text Search
  7. The system will try to fetch results that contains ALL your words.
  8. Once you add keywords, you'll see a new 'Search In' filter that makes your results even more precise.
  9. Text Search
Add to...
You have not created any category. Kindly create one to bookmark this item!
Create New Category
Hide
Title :
Description :
❮❮ Hide
Default View
Expand ❯❯
Close ✕
🔎 Highlights - Adv. Search
TEXT SEARCH:

Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search

Search In:
Main Text + AI Text
  • Main Text
  • Main Text + AI Text
  • AI Text
Law:
---- All Laws----
  • ---- All Laws----
  • Income Tax
  • Direct Taxes
  • Benami Property
  • Central GST Laws
  • SGST - State GST Laws
  • Customs
  • FTP - Foreign Trade Policy
  • SEZ - Special Economic Zone
  • FEMA - Foreign Exchange Management
  • Companies Law
  • SEBI - Securities & Exchange Board of India
  • IBC - Insolvency and Bankruptcy
  • Law of Competition
  • PMLA - Money-Laundering
  • Indian Laws
  • Bill / Finance Bills
  • Wealth Tax
  • Service Tax
  • Central Excise
  • VAT / Sales Tax
Month:
---- All Months ----
  • ---- All Months ----
  • January
  • February
  • March
  • April
  • May
  • June
  • July
  • August
  • September
  • October
  • November
  • December
Year:
---- All Years ----
  • ---- All Years ----
  • 2026
  • 2025
  • 2024
  • 2023
  • 2022
  • 2021
  • 2020
  • 2019
  • 2018
  • 2017
  • 2016
  • 2015
  • 2014
  • 2013
  • 2012
  • 2011
Sort By: ?
In Sort By 'Default', exact matches for text search are shown at the top, followed by the remaining results in their regular order.
Relevance Default Date
    Royalty and management support service adjustments fail where costs were recovered and aggregated TNMM benchmarking applied.
    Transfer pricing adjustments remanded for fresh review of intra-group services, sensor assembling method and comparables analysis
    Foreign asset disclosure in a substituted return can defeat penalty for an earlier omission when assessment accepts it.
    Comparability filters in TNMM require upfront R&D screening and broadly similar turnover scales for software services.
    Functional comparability in wholesale auto-component trading excludes retail and after-sales comparables, deleting transfer pricing adjustments
    Transfer pricing comparability: one support-services company accepted, government-owned and facility-management comparables excluded, forex loss claim...
    Pass-through LLC self-dealing defeats transfer pricing adjustment; linked receivables and profit recomputation were also deleted.
    Transfer pricing comparability: predominantly manufacturing comparables were excluded, and IT support charges were not fixed at nil.
    Substantial compliance in transfer pricing documentation defeats penalty for diamond trade record shortfall where arm's length pricing stood accepted
    Double taxation through rectification was impermissible where income already shown under proper heads was added again to business income.
    Bona fide return error defeats misreporting penalty where no specific statutory clause is identified in assessment.
    Interest computation in return processing restored for fresh factual verification and de novo adjudication.
    Revisional power under section 264 cannot worsen assessee's position; cash deposits explained from past salary savings.
    Fair market value of surrendered tenancy rights can determine cost of acquisition for redeveloped property gains
    Customs valuation enhancement fails when based on a retracted statement and non-comparable contemporaneous import invoices.
    Transportation charges and foreign-branch services were held outside service tax, while disclosed records defeated extended limitation.
    Negative list treatment for food grain transport without consignment notes defeats service tax and extended limitation demand.
    Arbitration clause confined to work-execution disputes; tax reimbursement claim under separate taxes clause was non-arbitrable on referral review.
    Financial intelligence sharing expanded to include the Directorate of Naval Intelligence under the PMLA notification.
    Common adjudicating authority appointed for specified customs show cause notices against an importer
❯❯
Maximize Maximize Maximize
0 / 200
Expand Note
Add to Folder

No Folders have been created

+

Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?

NOTE:

Highlights
Showing Results for :
Reset Filters
Results Found:
Show All Summaries Hide All Summaries

Highlights

Back

All Highlights

Showing Results for :
Reset Filters
No Records Found

Highlights

Back

All Highlights

whatsapp Join Channel
Showing Results for : Reset Filters

Difference between income shown in 26AS and as shown in profit &...

Clarification on Income Recognition: Avoid Double Taxation by Demonstrating Subsequent Year Taxation Per Form 26AS.

Contents
Summary
Note

Note

-

Bookmark

Print

Print

Income Tax April 4, 2022 Case Laws AT
Difference between income shown in 26AS and as shown in profit & loss account - Income recognition - If the assessee has offered the income pertaining to the month of March 2009, in the subsequent month i.e. April 2009, thus if any addition is made in the current year, the same would lead to double addition which is unwanted. Thus, we are of the view that the justice would be served to the Revenue as well as assessee if the assessee is able to prove that the difference of income pointed out by the AO has been offered to tax in the subsequent year. If that be so, no addition is warranted. - AT

Topics

Acts Income Tax