Patent-settlement expenditure treated as commercially expedient revenue outlay, with foreign-law restrictions inapplicable before the prospective amen...
Revision u/s 263 - Not only the Pr. CIT had on the basis of a misconceived reading of the position of law directed the Assessing Officer to initiate penalty proceedings in the case of the assessee u/s 271AAB of the Act, but he had also exceeded his jurisdiction while issuing such directions. - AT
Revision u/s 263 - Not only the Pr. CIT had on the basis of a misconceived reading of the position of law directed the Assessing Officer to initiate penalty proceedings in the case of the assessee u/s 271AAB of the Act, but he had also exceeded his jurisdiction while issuing such directions. - AT
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
of 4782
Join Channel
TaxTMI 
